Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19691 (HP)

PRASHANT GUPTA v. ABHISHEK JAIN AND OTHERS

CMP/20500/2025 · 2025-09-10

Sandeep Sharma

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

PRASHANT GUPTA Versus ABHISHEK JAIN AND OTHERS CMP-20500 of 2025 in COPC - 728 of 2024 10.09.2025 Present: Mr. Deepak Kaushal, Sr. Advocate, with Mr. Amit Sharma, Advocate, for the applicant/petitioner. Mr. Anup Rattan, Advocate General, with Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C. Verma, Additional Advocates General, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General, for State. While placing on record communication dated 09.09.2025, issued under the signatures of Executive Engineer, Nahan Division, HPPWD, Nahan, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that in terms of mandate contained in the judgment, alleged to have been violated, decision has been taken to issue Notification under Section 11 of the Land Acquisition Act. He states that direction already stands issued to the competent authority for issuance of Notification under Section 11 and the same shall be issued expeditiously. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly the same is disposed of with the direction to Executive Engineer, Nahan Division, HPPWD, Nahan, to ensure that Notification under Section 11 is issued expeditiously, preferably, within a period of four weeks, failing which, petitioner would be at liberty to get the contempt petition revived, so that appropriate action in accordance with law is taken against the erring officials. September 10, 2025 (Sandeep Sharma), (Rajeev Raturi) Judge