Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196907 (ALL)

RAM PRAKASH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO

BAIL/8563/2025 · 2025-10-09

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 8563 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.151 of 2025 under Sections 80(2), 85, 92, 351(3) BNS and Sections 3/4 Dowry Prohibition Act, P.S. Banthra, District Lucknow. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of the FIR it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was married to the son of the applicant in the year 2024 and she used to be harassed for non payment of dowry. Subsequently the entire family killed her. It is argued that the applicant is the father in law and in fact the son was missing after the incident. There is no allegation specific to the applicant so as to link or establish that before death the victim was harassed by the applicant in relation to demand of dowry either psychically or mentally. The applicant is suffering from ailments and is aged above 61 years. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the fact that the main allegations are against the son of the applicant, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Ram Prakash be released on bail in aforesaid FIR Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Arun Sinha, Ram Chandra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Ram Prakash .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s) number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 9, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 8563 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench