RAM SUMER YADAV AILAS SUMER AND OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO. AND OTHERS
CRLP/7627/2025 · 2025-10-27
Abdul Moin, Babita Rani
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196892 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196892 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 7627 of 2025 Court No. - 11 HON'BLE ABDUL MOIN, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Supplementary affidavit filed today in Court by the learned counsel for the petitioners be kept on record. 2. In paragraph 3 of the said supplementary affidavit, it has been indicated that the questionnaire was filed before the learned Court below regarding filing/submission of the charge sheet from which it emerged that the charge sheet has still not been filed. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned Additional Government Advocate for respondents no.1 to 3, and Sri Dhruv Ashish, learned counsel appearing for respondents no.4 & 5. 4. Instant petition has been filed praying for quashing of the first information report dated 17.07.2025 bearing no.170 of 2025, under Sections 191 (2), 115 (2), 352, 351 (3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 lodged at Police Station Nagram District Lucknow. Further prayer is for a mandamus commanding the respondents no. 1 to 3 not to arrest the petitioners in pursuance to the aforesaid FIR. 5. Upon filing of the petition, it was contended that the petitioners and respondents no.4 & 5 have entered into a compromise vide the compromise deed dated 26.07.2025, a copy of which is Annexure-3 to the petition. 6. This Court vide order dated 11.09.2025 had required the compromise deed Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Neelam Verma Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Sanjive Kumar Tripathi Ram Sumer Yadav Ailas Sumer And Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s)
to be placed before the learned Senior Registrar of this Court for verification of the said compromise. 7. In pursuance to the order of this Court dated 11.09.2025 the Senior Registrar of this Court vide his report dated 19.09.2025 has verified the compromise between the petitioners and respondents no.4 & 5. 8. As per the said compromise, the petitioners and respondents no.4 & 5 have agreed to end the dispute between themselves amicably. 9. Considering the aforesaid, the writ petition is allowed. The proceedings of FIR No.170, under Sections 191 (2), 115 (2), 352, 351 (3) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 lodged at Police Station Nagram District Lucknow, are quashed. October 27, 2025 Pachhere/- CRLP No. 7627 of 2025 2 (Mrs.
Babita Rani,J.) (Abdul Moin,J.) Digitally signed by :- SATYENDRA SINGH PACHHERE High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench