DEEPAK CHAUHAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. REVENUE, LKO. AND OTHERS
/7054/2025 · 2025-12-08
Alok Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196885 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196885 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 7054 of 2025 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE ALOK MATHUR, J.
1. Heard Sri Kamlesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner as well as Sri Yogesh Kumar Awasthi, learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
2. In view of the order proposed to be passed, requirement of issuance of notice to private respondents is dispensed with.
3. Instant petition has been filed by the petitioner praying for direction to the respondent No. 2 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Alapur, District - Ambedkar Nagar, to decide Restoration Application filed in Case No. 3067/2023/RST/10205/2025 (Computerized Case No. T 202304040403067/ T 202504040410205) - Deepak Chauhan Vs. Shyam Prasad, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously.
4. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the petitioner would be sufficiently met in case respondent no. 2 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Alapur, District - Ambedkar Nagar, considers and decides the aforesaid case in the time bound manner.
5. Learned Standing Counsel has no objection to the aforesaid prayer.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, without entering into the merits of the case, respondent no. 2 - Tehsildar, Tehsil - Alapur, District - Ambedkar Nagar, is directed to decide Restoration Application filed in Case No. 3067/2023/RST/10205/2025 (Computerized Case No. T 202304040403067/ T 202504040410205) - Deepak Chauhan Vs. Shyam Prasad, U/S 34 of the U.P. Revenue Code, 2006, expeditiously, say within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order, in accordance with law, if there is no legal impediment.
7. It is further directed that the parties to the case shall cooperate in expeditious disposal of the case and shall not seek any unnecessary adjournment, neither any such adjournment shall be granted by the Court concerned, except in exceptional circumstances.
8. With above observations/directions, the writ petition stands disposed of.
December 8, 2025 A. Verma Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Kamlesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Alok Mathur,J.) Deepak Chauhan .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Revenue, Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ANURAG VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench