PATIRAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME, CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/4671/2022 · 2025-12-19
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196877 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196877 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 4671 of 2022 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J. Order on Application
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State Counsel appearing on behalf of the opposite parties.
2. Petition had earlier been filed seeking a direction to opposite parties to allow petitioner to discharge his duties on the post of honorarium Guards.
3. Application has been filed seeking withdrawal of writ petition.
4. For reasons indicated in the affidavit filed in support of the application, the application is allowed and the petition is dismissed as not pressed without any adverse effects upon benefits already granted to petitioner. December 19, 2025 kvg/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Onkar Nath Tiwari, Pankaj Kumar, Richa Tiwari, Sanjay Kumar Singh, Shakshi Verma, Umesh Chandra Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Patiram .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Home, Civil Sectt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- GIREESAN KV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench