1 2025:CGHC:16729 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 2396 of 2022 1 - Govind Mishra S/o Subhash Mishra Aged About 47 Years Dr. Rajendra Prasad Ward No. 46, Raipur, District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Urban Administration Development Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Mantralaya, Atal Nagar New Raipur, District Raipur- Chhattisgarh. 2 - Collector Raipur District Raipur Chhattisgarh. 3 - Smt. Sunita Chawala W/o Vijay Chawala R/o Village Amlideeh, Raipur, Tahsil And District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 4 - Om Prakash Chhabariya And Sons R/o Village Amlideeh, Raipur, Tahsil And District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 5 - Vijay Kumar Ishwani S/o Late Hansraj R/o Village Amlideeh, Raipur, Tahsil And District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 6 - Ravi Kumar S/o Late Hansraj R/o Village Amlideeh, Raipur, Tahsil And District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 7 - Suresh Kumar Ishwani S/o Late Hansraj R/o Village Amlideeh, Raipur, Tahsil And District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 8 - Vinod Kumar Ishwani S/o Late Hansraj R/o Village Amlideeh, Raipur, Tahsil And District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 9 - Vijaya Mehrota D/o Dr. Sonu Mehrotra R/o Village Amlideeh, Raipur, Tahsil And District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Digitally signed by RAVI SHANKAR MANDAVI Date: 2025.04.11 20:35:09 +0530 2 10 - Kiran Pandey D/o Ram Niwas Pandey R/o Village Amlideeh, Raipur, Tahsil And District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. 11 - Smt. Sarita Tiwari W/o Sanjeev Tiwari R/o Village Amlideeh, Raipur, Tahsil And District- Raipur Chhattisgarh. ... Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Tapan K. Chandra, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. T.K. Jha, Advocate For State/Respondent : Mr. Khulesh Sahu, Panel Lawyer For Respondent No.3 : Mr. Pushp Kumar Gupta, Advocate appears on behalf of Mr. B.P. Sharma, Advocate Hon'ble Shri Justice Amitendra Kishore Prasad Order on Board 09/04/2025 At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time this petition has rendered infructuous and seeks permission of this Court to withdraw this petition, however, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file appropriate petition at appropriate stage. 2) No objection from other side. 3) Permission is granted. 4) Accordingly, this petition is dismissed as withdrawn being rendered infructuous with the aforesaid liberty to the petitioner. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Ravi Mandavi