Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196859 (ALL)

HARI SHANKAR v. SARDAR AVTAR SINGH

CLRE/116/2005 · 2025-10-27

Jaspreet Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CIVIL REVISION No. - 116 of 2005 Court No. - 6 HON'BLE JASPREET SINGH, J. 1. The record indicates that by means of the order dated 11.10.2022 notices were issued to the respondent. 2. This Court on 15.05.2025 had passed the following order, which read as under:- "Learned counsel for the revisionist submits that they are not prepared with the matter and seeks an adjournment. Considering the fact that the revision is of the year 2005 and the extract of the order-sheet indicates that since 2018 onward the matter is being listed peremptorily yet there is no cooperation. List on 15.07.2025 peremptorily. In case if the counsel for the parties do not argue in the matter on the next date, appropriate order will be passed. It is also noticed that none has put in appearance on behalf of the respondent. Office is directed to furnish its report regarding the service of summons which were issued in furtherance of the order dated 11.10.2022." Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Mohd. Arif Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Brijesh Verma Hari Shankar .....Revisionist(s) Sardar Avtar Singh .....Opposite Party(s) 3. The instant civil revision is of the year 2005 and today none has put in appearance on behalf of the revisionist. 4. Vide order dated 15.05.2025, it was provided that the matter shall be listed peremptorily, but despite the same, there is none to press the revision. 5. In view thereof, the revision is dismissed for want of prosecution. 6. Consigned to record including connected matters. October 27, 2025 Rakesh/- CLRE No. 116 of 2005 2 (Jaspreet Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH PRAJAPAT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench