DEEPAK KUMAR @ DEEPAK KUMAR VISHWAKARMA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME CIVIL SECTT. LKO. AND ANOTHER
A482/9389/2025 · 2025-11-10
Rajeev Bharti
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196830 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196830 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 9389 of 2025 Court No. - 23 HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
2. The present application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. has been filed seeking quashing of impugned charge sheet dated 30.01.2010 and cognizance/summoning order dated 09.02.2010, Non-bailable warrants dated 06.09.2025 & 03.10.2025 issued by Judicial Magistrate, Safipur, District- Unnao as well as entire proceedings of Case No.593 of 2022; 'State Vs. Deepak Kumar' arising out of Case Crime No.87 of 2010, under Section 279, 304-A, 427 I.P.C., Police Station-Safipur, District-Unnao.
3. At the very outset, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this application on merits. However, he submits that the applicant will surrender before the trial court and apply for bail. He prays that the applicant may be granted the benefit of the case of Satender Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another, reported in (AIR 2022 SC 3386).
4. It is, therefore, directed that in case the applicant surrenders before the Court below within three weeks from today and prefers bail application, the trial court will decide the said bail application, as expeditiously as possible, taking into account the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra). Thereafter, the applicant may also move discharge application, which will be decided by the court below expeditiously, according to provisions of law.
5. For a period of three weeks from today, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. In case, the applicant does not appear in terms of this order, coercive action shall be taken against him. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : O.P. Tiwari, Gaurav Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Deepak Kumar @ Deepak Kumar Vishwakarma .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Civil Sectt. Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
6. The application stands disposed of. (Rajeev Bharti,J.) November 10, 2025 Arti/- A482 No. 9389 of 2025 2
Digitally signed by :- ARTI MAURYA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench