SWATI SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER
NABAIL/1513/2025 · 2025-10-17
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196802 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196802 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1513 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant; learned AGA for the State and perused the records.
2. The present application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR/Case Crime No.0077 of 2025 under section 302/34 IPC, P.S. Cantt, District Lucknow.
3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the applicant used to stay as a tenant and the son of the informant also used to stay nearby. It was stated that the daughter in law of the informant was having a illicit relations with the applicant and subsequently she was found dead in the tenanted accommodation of the applicant.
4. The counsel for the applicant states that the cause of death is ante-mortem hanging and there are no injury mark on the body.
5. Learned AGA opposes the bail application.
6. Considering the fact that the body of the deceased was found in the house of the applicant, which requires to be investigated, prima-facie, a case for anticipatory bail is not made out.
7. The application for anticipatory bail is rejected. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Rishi Kumar Khare Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Swati Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s)
8. The applicant may apply for regular bail, if so advised in accordance with law. October 17, 2025 VNP/- NABAIL No. 1513 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- VISHVANATH PRASAD SHUKLA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench