SAEMAH LATIF v. HARDESH KUMAR,SECY.EDUCATION AND ORS.
CPSW/156/2013 · 2025-02-11
Moksha Khajuria Kazmi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1968 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 1968 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Sr. No. 51
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU& KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT JAMMU
CPSW 156/2013 In [SWP 2145/2012]
Saemah Latif
…. Petitioner(s)
Through:- Mr. S. H. Rather, Advocate.
V/s
Hardesh Kumar and Ors.
…..Respondent(s)
Through:- Mr. Adarsh Bhagat, Government Advocate.
CORAM : HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE MOKSHA KHAJURIA KAZMI, JUDGE
ORDER 11.02.2025
Learned counsel for the petitioner states that the grievance of the petitioner has been redressed by the respondents, as such, he does not press the instant petition. The instant petition is dismissed as not being pressed.
(Moksha Khajuria Kazmi)
Judge JAMMU 11.02.2025 Narinder
Narinder Kumar 2025.03.01 11:01 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document