HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 482 BNSS No. - 1699 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard Sri Eshan Garg, learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and Sri Himanshu Suryawanshi, who has filed Vakalatnama on behalf of the complainant. The Vakalatnama is taken on record. 2. The present application has been filed under Section 482 of BNSS seeking anticipatory bail apprehending arrest in FIR No.508 of 2025, under Sections 80(2) 85 of BNS and Section 3/4 of D.P. Act, Police Station Mohammadpur Khala, District Barabanki. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that the daughter of the informant was married to the applicant in the year 2019 and subsequently, the entire matrimonial family had killed her for dowry. The postmortem report indicates the cause of death due to ante mortem handing and apart form the ligature mark no other injury was noticed. The applicant is the mother-in-law. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the anticipatory bail prayer. 5. Considering the postmortem report and there being nothing against the applicant to suggest that soon before her death, the victim was subjected to any physical or mental harassment in relation to any demand of dowry, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled for the benefit of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Eshan Garg, Prachi Arya Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rajrani .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) anticipatory bail. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application is allowed . 7. In the event of arrest, let the applicant Rajrani be released on anticipatory bail in the abovesaid first information report number till conclusion of the trial on her furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.30,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. (d) The applicant shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court. November 14, 2025 akverma NABAIL No. 1699 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench