MAIKIN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. /ADDL. CHIEF SECY. HOME DEPTT. LKO.
BAIL/7147/2025 · 2025-10-17
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196794 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196794 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7147 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.148 of 2025, under Sections 115(2), 352, 351(3), 105 of BNS, Police Station Taalgaon, District Sitapur. 3. In terms of the FIR, it was alleged that on account of land dispute, the accused named in the FIR started hitting the informant with the use of Lathi-Danda and fists, which resulted in substantial injury. Subsequently, on account of the said injury, the informant died. The postmortem report on record indicates the cause of death as ante mortem head injury. The postmortem report also reveals three injuries sustained by the deceased. My attention is drawn to the statement of the informant who assigned the role of Lathi Danda etc. to the other co-accused persons. No weapon was recovered at the instance of the applicant. 4. Learned A.G.A. vehemently opposed the bail prayer. 5. Considering the statement of the informant who assigned the role of Lathi-Danda etc. to the other co-accused persons, no weapon was recovered at the instance of the applicant; the applicant is a lady and the fact that the applicant has no criminal antecedents and is languishing in jail since 13.06.2025, I am of the view that the applicant is entitled to be Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mahendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Maikin .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. /Addl. Chief Secy. Home Deptt. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
released on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed. 6.
Let the applicant Maikin be released on bail in the abovesaid first information report number on her furnishing personal bonds and two reliable sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 17, 2025 akverma BAIL No. 7147 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench