Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196791 (ALL)

VIKRAM v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME DEPTT. U.P. LKO.

BAIL/11019/2024 · 2025-10-10

Pankaj Bhatia

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 11019 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.99 of 2024, under Sections 498-A, 304B I.P.C. and Sections 3/4 D.P. Act, P.S. Isanagar, District Lakhimpur Kheri. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the applicant is the husband and other co-accused i.e. father in law Ramsahare @ Bamasare and mother in law Ram Pyari have been enlarged on bail vide orders dated 28.8.2024 and 12.8.2024 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 9122 of 2024 and Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 8600 of 2024 respectively. While granting bail it was taken note of that the victim died on account of burn injuries while she was cooking and she was taken to hospital by the father in law himself. 4. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances and adopting the same reasoning, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in custody since 20.3.2024 and having no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. 6. Let the applicant Vikram be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Azmi Yousuf, Amit Kumar Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Vikram .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Deptt. U.P. Lko. .....Opposite Party(s) on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 10, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 11019 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench