Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19679 (CAL)

ANINDITA MAITY(MITRA) v. STATE OF WEST BENGAL & ORS.

WPA/6357/2020 · 2025-02-24

Subhendu Samanta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

26.03.2025 Ct.No. 24 Sl.No. 5 Amalranjan IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE WPA 6357 of 2020 Anindita Maity (Mitra) VS The State of West Bengal and ors. Ms. Debjani Sengupta Ms. Koyel Bag Mr. Abhijit Chatterjee …for the Vidyasagar University Mr. Billwadal Bhattacharyya, Sr. Adv. Mr. Anish Kumar Mukherjee Mr. Tamoghna Pramanick …for the respondent nos. 6 & 7 1. This matter appears for correction in respect of judgment dated 24th February, 2025. In the list of representation appearing at page 1 of the judgment for the respondent nos. 6 & 7 after Mr. Billwadal Bhattacharyya, the term “senior advocate” should be noted instead of Advocate. 2. In paragraph 8 at page 5 in the first line name of learned advocate “Mr. Ray” should be deleted, in its place “Ms. Debjani Sengupta, learned advocate” should be incorporated. 3. Office is directed to make out the corrections within a fortnight. ( Subhendu Samanta, J. )