Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196785 (ALL)

SATTAN PRASAD AND 9 OTHERS v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. DEPTT. OF AGRICULTURE EDUCATION AND RESEARCH AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/14978/2025 · 2025-12-19

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14978 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, Sri Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 1, Sri Prashant Kumar Singh,learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 to 5 and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs :- "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to pay the current amount of minimum pay scale as per the recommendation of 7th pay commission on monthly basis to the petitioners. ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding and directing the respondents to pay arrears accrued w.e.f. 01.01.2016 after implementation recommendation of 7th pay commission alongwith interest @ 9% per annum." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioners to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 3/Vice Chancellor, Acharya Narendra Dev University of Agriculture & Technology Kumarganj, Ayodhya and the opposite party no. 3 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioners are given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all their claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 3/Vice Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shyam Bihari, Viswash Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Prashant Kumar Singh Sattan Prasad And 9 Others .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Deptt. Of Agriculture Education And Research And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Chancellor, Acharya Narendra Dev University of Agriculture & Technology Kumarganj, Ayodhya within the period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 3 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of eight weeks, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of. December 19, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 14978 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench