Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196780 (ALL)

PREM KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. SECY. SECONDARY EDU. LKO. AND 4 OTHERS

WRIA/14988/2025 · 2025-12-19

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14988 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Since, the matter is being decided at the admission stage, notice to opposite party no. 5 is hereby dispensed with. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Devesh Pathak, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 1 to 4 and perused the records. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main relief:- "i.) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding the opposite parties to consider and decide the claim of petitioner for grant of promotion to the petitioner on the post of L.T. Grade against the vacancy caused due to retirement of Sri Prem Chandra Singh on 30.06.2003, with effect from the date of occurrence of vacancy i.e. 01.07.2003, or in the alternative, at least from the date of resolution/proposal of the Committee of Management dated 17.03.2006." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 2/The Director of Education (Secondary) Lucknow and the opposite party no. 2 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsels appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Anshuman Singh Rathore Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Prem Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Secy. Secondary Edu. Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioners are given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 2/The Director of Education (Secondary) Lucknow within the period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 2 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of eight weeks, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of. December 19, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 14988 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench