Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196775 (ALL)

NITISH KUMAR SHRIVASTAVA v. DISTRICT MAGISTRATE,LUCKNOW,DISTT.LUCKNOW AND 5 OTHERS

WPIL/1178/2025 · 2025-11-21

Subhash Vidyarthi

Public Interest Litigationbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1178 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. 1. Heard Sri Brijesh Kumar Yadav, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Vikas Rai, the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State and perused the records. 2. By means of the instant petition filed in public interest litigation the petitioner has sought a direction to the opposite parties no.1 and 2 for removal of illegal encroachment over the public utility land bearing Gata Nos.257, 260, 325 situated in Village Belwa, Pargana Mahona, Tehsil B.K.T. District Lucknow. 3. On the basis of written instructions provided by the Tehsildar, Bakshi Ka Talab, Lucknow the learned Standing Counsel has informed the court that the proceedings under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code have already been instituted for removal of encroachments. 4. In these circumstances, this petition is disposed of by issuing a direction to the opposite party no.2/Tehsildar, Tehsil Bakshi Ka Talab, District Lucknow to conclude the proceedings under Section 67 of U.P. Revenue Code bearing No.T202510460409509 expeditiously in accordance with law without granting any unnecessary adjournments to any of the parties. November 21, 2025 Ram. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Brijesh Kumar Yadav, Surya Prakash Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Dilip Kumar Pandey (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Nitish Kumar Shrivastava .....Petitioner(s) District Magistrate,Lucknow,Distt.Lucknow And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- RAM SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench