HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 14765/2014 Satyaveer Singh S/o Dhanna Ram, aged about 58 years, R/o Village Dhani Bhaloth Post Bhaloth Tehsil Buhana, District Jhunjhunu. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director cum Special Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Jhunjhunu. 4. The Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Buhana, District Jhunjhunu. 5. The Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Surajgarh, District Jhunjhunu. 6. The Dy. Director, Pension and Pensioners Welfare Department, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 11677/2014 Leeladhar Sharma S/o Inder Lal Sharma, aged about 61 years, R/o 54, Ganga Sagar-A Colony, Near Sayar Vidhya Mandir School, Bajari Mandi Road, panchyawala, Vaishali Nagar, Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State of Rajasthan through Additional Chief Secretary, Rural Development and Panchayati Raj Department, Govt. of Rajasthan, Secretariat, Jaipur. 2. The Director cum Special Secretary, Panchayat Raj Department, Rajasthan, Jaipur. 3. Chief Executive Officer, Zila Parishad Jhunjhunu. 4. The Development Officer, Panchayat Samiti Buhana, District Jhunjhunu. 5. The Dy. Director, Pension and Pensioners Welfare Department, Jyoti Nagar, Jaipur. (2 of 2) [CW-14765/2014] ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Nagendra Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Aditya Sharma for Mr. Kesar Singh Shekhawat, AGC JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 10/03/2025 1. Since common question of facts is involved in these petitions, hence with the consent of counsel for the parties, matters are being decided by this common order. 2. By way of filing these petitions, the petitioners are seeking directions to release their pension, gratuity and other retiral dues. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the respondents apprised this Court that during pendency of these petitions, the retiral dues have already been released in favour of the petitioners, hence, under the changed circumstances, no cause of action survives with the petitioners to continue with these petitions and the same have become infructuous. 4. Considering the above factual aspect of the matter, both the instant writ petitions are dismissed as rendered infructuous. 5. However, the petitioners would be at liberty to file fresh petition, in case, any cause of action/ grievance still survives. 6. The stay applications and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/132-133