IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA Execution Petition No. 1141 of 2025 Date of Decision: 19.08.2025 _______________________________________________________ Champa Devi & others …….Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and others … Respondents ______________________________________________________ Coram: Hon’ble Mr. Justice Sandeep Sharma, Judge. Whether approved for reporting? 1 For the Petitioners: Mr. Devender K. Sharma, Advocate. For the Respondents: Mr. Rajan Kahol, Mr. Vishal Panwar and Mr. B.C.Verma, Additional Advocate Generals, with Mr. Ravi Chauhan, Deputy Advocate General. _______________________________________________________ Sandeep Sharma, Judge(oral): While placing on record copy of communication dated 18.08.2025, issued under the signatures of Director, School Education, Himachal Pradesh, enclosing therewith copy of office order dated 13.08.2025, Mr. Vishal Panwar, learned Additional Advocate General, states that the mandate contained in the judgment sought to be executed stands duly complied with and as such, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings. 2. Having perused the aforesaid communication as well as documents annexed therewith, which are taken on record, this Court finds that respondents after having found the petitioners similarly situate to petitioners in CWP No. 3341 of 2019, titled Madan Lal Sharma vs. State of Himachal Pradesh and others, have held them entitled to the pay scale of 1Whether the reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 Rs.5480-8925(HPCS(RP)Rules, 1998) alongwith all other consequential benefits i.e. pay fixation, ACPs and Pension etc. The Principal/Headmaster concerned has been directed to extend the benefit of revised pay scale of Rs. 5480-8925 from the date of their initial appointments, with further direction to release the consequential benefits regarding monetary benefits as per the instructions issued by the Finance Department Himachal Pradesh. 3. In view of the above, nothing remains to be adjudicated in the instant proceedings and accordingly, same are disposed of, reserving liberty to the petitioners to file appropriate proceedings in appropriate Court of law qua the surviving grievance, if any. (Sandeep Sharma), Judge August 19,2025 (shankar)