SATYENDRA ARYA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. ADDL. CHIEF SECY. BASIC EDU. LKO AND 2 OTHERS
WRIA/15118/2025 · 2025-12-19
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196759 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196759 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 15118 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Ashutosh Mishra, learned counsel for the State, Sri Prashant Kumar Singh,learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 & 3 and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main relief :-
"i. Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby commanding and directing the opposite parties particularly opposite party no.3 to pay the salary Rs.81200/- to the petitioner which is being paid to the junior teachers with all consequential benefits along with arrears." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 3/Finance and Account Officer, Basic Education, Ambedkar Nagar and the opposite party no. 3 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court.
Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioners are given liberty to move a fresh representation, while Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Krishna Madhav Shukla Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Prashant Kumar Singh Satyendra Arya .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Addl. Chief Secy. Basic Edu. Lko And 2 Others .....Respondent(s)
raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 3/ Finance and Account Officer, Basic Education, Ambedkar Nagar within the period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 3 is
directed to consider and decide the same within further period of six weeks, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby
disposed of. December 19, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 15118 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench