Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19675 (ORI)

ASWINI KUMAR PATTNAYAK v. STATE OF ODISHA

WP(C)/6243/2025 · 2025-03-06

Miss Savitri Ratho, S K Sahoo

Civil Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No. 6243 of 2025 Aswini Kumar Pattnayak ….. Petitioner Mr. S.B. Mohanty, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha & Others ….. Opp. Parties Mr. Debasish Nayak, A.G.A. CORAM: THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE S.K. SAHOO THE HON’BLE MISS JUSTICE SAVITRI RATHO ORDER 06.03.2025 Order No. 01. This matter is taken up through Hybrid arrangement (video conferencing/physical mode). This Writ Petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayer: “It is therefore prayed that, this Hon’ble Court may graciously be pleased :- (i) To admit the writ petition. (ii) To quash the Mutation case No. 4312/2024 under the Writ of Prohibition (initiated by the Tahasildar, Soro) which is not maintainable in view of Govt. circular dtd. 18.11.1988 and consequential Board of Revenue Instruction dtd. 25.4.1990 and clarificatory letter of the Govt. dtd. 20.12.2016. (iii) To direct the Opposite Parties to confirm the earlier settlement of the Schedule land as recorded in favour of the petitioner by the implying direction of the Supreme Court dtd. 15.12.2015 passed in Civil Appeal No. 7729/2009 and clarificatory letter of the Govt. dtd. 26.12.2016 and the petitioner’s right and possession over the schedule land be protected. And may pass any other order / orders, direction/directions as deem fit and proper in the interest of justice. And for which act of kindness the petitioner shall as in duty bound ever pray.” Learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw this Writ Petition to seek appropriate remedy in accordance with law. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of as withdrawn. (S.K. Sahoo) Judge (Savitri Ratho) Judge Sukanta/Puspa Designation: Senior Stenographer