Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19675 (KAR)

SRI K SAMBASIVAN v. THE ADDL SECRETARY-1

WP/10412/2021 · 2025-01-28

M G Uma

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:3778 WP No. 10412 of 2021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA WRIT PETITION NO. 10412 OF 2021 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SRI K SAMBASIVAN SENIOR CITIZEN, 74 YEARS, S/O T.S. KUPPUSWAMY, R/O 973, 66TH CROSS, 17TH E MAIN, 5TH BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BANGALORE-560010. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. K. SAMBASIVAN, PARTY-IN-PERSON (ABSENT)) AND: 1. THE ADDL. SECRETARY-1 DEPARTMENT OF PERSONNEL ADMINISTRATION AND REFORMS O/O THE GOVT. OF KARNATAKA SECRETARIAT III FLOOR, PODUM BLOCK, VISHVESHWARAIAH TOWERS, BANGALORE-560001. 2. THE REGISTRAR GENERAL O/O THE RG, HON HCK, BANGALORE-560001. 3. THE REGISTRAR (JUDICIAL) O/O THE RG, HON HCK, BANGALORE-560001. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. S.Y. SHIVALLI, ADVOCATE FOR R2 & R3 NOTICE NOT YET ORDERED BUT V/K FILED HCLC SERVED-UNREPRESENTED) Digitally signed by B VEENA KUMARI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:3778 WP No. 10412 of 2021 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE THE INVESTIGATIONAL REPORT AS DIRECTED BY THE ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY GOVT. OF KARNATAKA VIDE HIS LETTER DTD.24.1.2019 WITHIN 30 DAYS AND VIDE ANNEXURE-H. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE M G UMA ORAL ORDER Petitioner-party-in-person is absent. No representation. 2. Even on the last date of hearing, the petitioner- party-in-person was absent. 3. The order sheet dated 25.11.2024 reads as under: "Party-in-person/petitioner is absent. No representation. List this matter finally, as a last chance, after two weeks." - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:3778 WP No. 10412 of 2021 4. It is stated that this order sheet was already uploaded in the website. Inspite of the same, the petitioner-party-in-person is absent. 5. The petition is of the year 2021. Still needful is not done pertaining to the office objections. 6. It appears that the petitioner-party-in-person is not interested in prosecuting the petition. Hence, the petition stands dismissed for non- prosecution. Sd/- (M G UMA) JUDGE BVK List No.: 1 Sl No.: 8