Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196748 (ALL)

ANUJ KUMAR GUPTA @ ANUJ GUPTA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

NA528/1153/2025 · 2025-10-15

Rajeev Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 1153 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Sri Chandan Srivastava, Advocate on behalf of the complainant is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the complainant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material available on record. 3. This application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To quash the entire proceedings of Crl. Case No. 53259 of 2025 u/s 420, 406, 504 I.P.C., titled as State of U.P. Vs. Anuj Kumar Gupta alias Anuj Gupta, and the charge- sheet dated 06.03.2025 u/s 420, 406, 504 I.P.C. arising out of F.I.R. No. 08 of 2025, Police Station- Shushant Golf City, District- Lucknow South (Commissionerate Lucknow) including entire proceedings in pursuance thereof." 4. After arguing the matter up to some length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicant may be permitted to move discharge application and suitable directions may be issued for expeditious disposal of the same. 5. Learned A.G.A. as well as learned counsel for the complainant has no objection in grant of aforesaid prayer. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Saurabh Misra, Jai Prakash Awasthi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Anuj Kumar Gupta @ Anuj Gupta .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 6. In view of above, it is provided that applicant is permitted to move his discharge application(s) within four weeks from today and in case any such application(s) is/are being filed, same shall be heard and decided expeditiously after hearing the parties, in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order. 7. Till the aforesaid period of four weeks and during pendency of discharge application, no coercive steps shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. 8. In case of failure on the part of applicant in moving the discharge application(s) within the aforesaid period, he will not be entitled to the benefit of this order. 9. With above directions, this application stands disposed of. October 15, 2025 Arpan NA528 No. 1153 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench