DESHRAJ v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF HOME LKO.
BAIL/12979/2024 · 2025-10-10
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196745 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196745 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 12979 of 2024 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Jayveer, learned counsel for the informant and perused the record. 2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.224 of 2024, under Sections 85, 108, 115(2), 351 (3) BNS, P.S. Ajgain, District Unnao. 3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of the FIR the daughter of the informant was married to the applicant in the year 2017 and on 25.7.2024 it was alleged that the informant received phone call from her daughter that her matrimonial family was harassing her. Subsequently the daughter as well the grand niece of the informant committed suicide by hanging. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the body was recovered after breaking open the door which according to him demonstrates that the cause of death cannot be linked to the applicant. The post mortem report indicate the cause of death as ante mortem hanging. 4. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the bail application. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 25.7.2024 having no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Srees Kumar Srivastava, Ana Fatma, Mohd. Salman, Mukhtar Ahamad Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Jayveer Rajput Deshraj .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
6. Let the applicant Deshraj be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
October 10, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 12979 of 2024 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench