Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196728 (ALL)

ROHIT SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND ANOTHER

A482/8679/2025 · 2025-10-10

Brij Raj Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8679 of 2025 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 2. Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the punishment provided against the impugned order is less than 7 years. He has requested that he may be given the benefit of Satendra Kumar Antil. 2. The present application has been filed with a prayer to pass an order allowing the petition quashing the entire proceedings of the S.T. No. 332/2025, State Vs. Rohit Singh, pending in the court of Additional Session Judge, Court No.7, Unnao and impugned summoning order dated 12.03.2021 passed by Chief Judicial Magistrate, Unnao, in Misc. Case No. 5676/2021 by means of which the applicant has been summoned under Section 18/27 Drugs and Cosmetics Act, 1940, Police Station Hasanganj, District Unnao. 3. After arguing the matter at some length, learned counsel for the applicant submits that he does not want to press this application on merit and he confines his prayer only to the extent that applicant may be permitted to move bail application in light of judgment passed by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another (Special Leave to Appeal (Crl.) No.5191 of 2021, before the court concerned and suitable directions may be issued that same may be heard and decided expeditiously, in accordance to law. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ram Chandra Dwivedi, Mayank Tiwari, Uday Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rohit Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 3. In view of the above, the application is disposed of with a direction to the court concerned that if the applicant applies for bail before the court concerned within three weeks from today, his prayer for bail shall be considered and decided expeditiously, in accordance with law. 4. For a period of three weeks from today or till the applicant applies for bail, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant in the aforesaid case. October 10, 2025 Muk A482 No. 8679 of 2025 2 (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- MOHD UMAR KHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench