SANDHYA SRIVASTAVA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. OF AGRI. LKO AND 4 OTHERS
WRIA/14246/2025 · 2025-12-10
Manish Mathur
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196718 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196718 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14246 of 2025 Court No. - 7 HON'BLE MANISH MATHUR, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for petitioner and learned State counsel for opposite parties.
2. The present petition has been filed seeking the following main relief:-
"(i). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus thereby directing the opposite parties particularly opposite party no.5 to release the gratuity amount of the deceased-mother in favour of the petitioner along with interest on delay for payment, in the interest of justice."
3. Since consideration of petitioner's grievance would entail factual aspects, without entering into merits of the case, liberty is granted to petitioner to file a fresh representation before opposite party No. 3 i.e. Deputy Director Agriculture (Administration), Krishi Bhawan, U.P. Lucknow. In case such a representation is filed, the same shall be decided within a period of six weeks from the date a certified copy of this order is produced before the said authority.
4. With the aforesaid directions, the writ petition stands disposed of. December 10, 2025 Subodh/- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Raj Priya Srivastava Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Manish Mathur,J.) Sandhya Srivastava .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Of Agri. Lko And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SUBODH KUMAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench