Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19670 (AP)

D VENKATESH v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

CRLP/5686/2025 · 2025-05-28

Harinath N

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

FE5ngg5REEprrI -i lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARA TLJI lr|r`r`^`, -. ,_ _. _ ___ _ _ __ ____. I , I . ,|l,InI`J THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF MA _. | \ I- -. _ _ _ -` _ ` |\|I \ TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE .-PRESENT: THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N Between.. CRIMINAL PETITION NO., 5686 OF 2025 1. D Venkatesh, s/o. D. Ranganadham, aged about 30 years R/o. D. Agraharam, HarI-jana Wada, Nagari MandaI, Chittoor DistrI-Ct. (A-2) 2. D. T]'rumala @ D. ManI'kandan, S/o D. Papal-ah, aged about 20 years, R/o. D. Agraharam, Harijana wada, Nagarj MandaI, Chittoor Distrl'ct. (A- 7) Petitioners/Accused NoI2 and 7 AND The State ofAndhra pradesh, Rep by I-tS Public prosecutor, High Court of Andhra pradesh, Amaravathi, Through statl'on House Officer, Nagari urban PoII'Ce StatI'On, Chittoor Distrl'ct. Respondent petI-lion under Section 482 of BNSS, 2023(Section 438 of Cr.P.C), is filed praying that in the cl'rcumstances stated in the memorandum of grounds filed in support of the criminal petitI-On, the High Court may be pleased to grant AntI'CiPatOry Bail to the petitioners/Accused Nos. 2 & 7 in Crime No.198 of 2024 on the file of the Nagari urban poll'ce statl'on, chittoor DI-Strict, in the event of their arrest and pass The petjtjon comI-ng On for hearing, upon pe"sjng the petition and the memorandum of grounds filed jn support thereof and upon hearing the arguments of sri KANDERI CHETHAN, Advocate for the petl-tjoner and of PUBLIC PROSECUTOR for Respondent, the court made the following ORDER APHCO10275712025 H.'H lN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATl (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY, THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY F[VE PRESENT THE HONouRABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 5686/2025 [3457] Between : D Venkatesh and Others ...PETITIONER/ACCUSED(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh ...RESPONDENT/COMPLAINANT Counsel for the Petitioner/accused(S): 1, RANDERI CHETHAN counsel for the Respondent/complainant: 1.PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: ORDER: This Criminal Petition, u/Sec.482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik suraksha sanhita, 2023, has been filed by the petitioners/A2 and A7, seeking anticipatory bail, in Crime No.198/2024 of Nagari UPS, Chittoor District. 2. A case has been registered against the Petitioners for the offences punishable u/sec.329(3),'115(2),118(1), 351(2) r/w 3(5) of B-N.S. 3. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioners and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondent/State. 4. Case of the prosecution, in brief, isthat, On 14.12.2024, while the complainant]s brother in law was leveling a house site, the accused, €---, ' a | I_ I along with A7 quarreled with him, assaulted him with sticks and caused injuries. Again on 15.12.2024, the accused assaulted the complainant with sticks and stones. ln that incident, the complainant's wife, father, and mother in law sustained severe injuries. Basing on the report of the complainant, the crime was registered and im,estigated into. 5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and learned Assistant PublI-C Prosecutor. Perused the record. 6. Learned counsel forthe petitioners submit that in this crime, A1, A3 to A6 were granted regular bail by thI'S Court vide Crl.P.No.4718 of 2025 on 15.5.2025 and the case of the petitioners stands on the same footing as that of A1, A3 to A6 and prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 7. A perusal of the material available on record goes to show that the crime was regist;red on 17.12.2024. By.l'this time most of the investigatl'on might have been completed. The other accused i.e. A1, A3 to A6 were already enlarged on regular baI'I by this Court vide orders in Crl.P.No.4718 of 2025 on 15.5.2025. Considering the said fact, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 8. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender before the Station House Officer, Nagari UPS, Chittoor District within a period of two (02) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of the order and on _ __I_ their surrender, the petitioners shall be released on bal'I on their executing a personal bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand only) each with two sureties for a like sum ¢each to the satisfaction of the arresting police officials and the petitioners shall make themselves available for investigation as and when required and they shall not cause any threat, inducement or promise to the prosecution witnesses. 9. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. 9. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is allowed. SD/-M.SRINIVAS ASSISTANT EGiSTRAR //, € 4, - ; ;A.S-a set±AL+Z£1v` //TRUE COPY// FL,. , ``,`n`, I nn I I`l=`JIO I r{AR To, 1. The Station House Officer, Nagari Urban Police Station, Chittoor District. 2. One CC to SRl. KANDERI CHETHAN Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two cos to the PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, High Court ofA.P [OPUC] 4. One spare copy psk HIGH COURT HN,J DATED : 29/05/2025 BAIL ORDER CRLP.No.5686 of 2025 ALLOWED il.,--`\¥.'=\.,I.~` =`. <J`.`'r.l`' ` .. :`uerf.-`