HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9880 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on the part of the respondents in deciding the application dated 22.09.2025 filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid application before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent Nos.3 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the application of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, writ petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh application before respondent No.3 within a period of one week from date. Upon filing such an application, respondent No. 3/Executive Engineer should pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid application of the petitioner in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from date of receipt of the aforesaid application after granting Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sudhakar Shukla, Dilip Kumar Chaudhary Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Manish Jauhari Arun Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Energy Lko. And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and any other private respondents for whom the electricity poles have been constructed. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. October 15, 2025 Ashutosh WRIC No. 9880 of 2025 2 (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench