DOODH NATH TRIPATHI v. SRI SAURABH BABU, PRIN. SECY. CO OPERATIVE DEPTT. U.P. LKO. AND 2 OTHERS
CAPL/2686/2025 · 2025-10-15
Manish Kumar
Contempt Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196686 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196686 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2686 of 2025 Court No. - 8 HON'BLE MANISH KUMAR, J. The respondent no. 3 has filed compliance affidavit, which is taken on record.
Learned counsel for the respondent no. 3 has submitted that along with arrears, regular monthly pension is being paid to the applicant with an assurance that the pension will be given to the applicant regularly every month in pursuance of the direction issued by the writ Court.
Learned counsel for the applicant has very fairly submitted that the judgment and order passed by the writ court has been complied with and for all practical purposes, the present contempt petition has become infructuous and the same may be dismissed as infructuous but liberty may be given to the applicant that in case there is any default in payment of regular pension in future, the applicant may be permitted to move an appropriate application in the present case In view of above, the present contempt petition is dismissed as infructuous. It is always open for the applicant to move an appropriate application in case pension will not be paid regularly. Notice, if any, stands discharged. October 15, 2025 Nitesh Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Manish Mani Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) :
(Manish Kumar,J.) Doodh Nath Tripathi .....Applicant(s) Sri Saurabh Babu, Prin. Secy. Co Operative Deptt. U.P. Lko. And 2 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- NITESH KUMAR TEWARY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench