HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 10447 of 2025 Court No. - 3 HON'BLE SHEKHAR B. SARAF, J. HON'BLE PRASHANT KUMAR, J. 1. None appears on behalf of the petitioner. 2. Shri Aakash Prasad, learned counsel appearing on behalf of U.P. State Bridge Corporation being respondent No.3 herein submits that the prayer of the petitioner has become infructuous as the additional compensation has been paid to the petitioner after entering into a settlement with the petitioner. 3. In light of the submission made by the counsel appearing on behalf of the respondent, we are of the view that no cause of action remains. 4. Accordingly, the matter is consigned to record. 5. The writ petition is disposed of. 6. In the event, the petitioner is of the view that the cause of action still survives, liberty is granted to the petitioner to file an application for recall/variation/modification of this order in accordance with law. November 10, 2025 Ashutosh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Ravindra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Aakash Prasad (Prashant Kumar,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Ram Kishore Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. P.W.D. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHUTOSH PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench