ISRARUL RAHMAN v. STATE OF U.P. THRU SECY.DEPTT.OF SECONDARY EDU. LKO. and ORS.
WRIA/16112/2017 · 2025-11-21
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196673 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196673 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 16112 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 21, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Omendra Pratap Singh, Dhirendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Israrul Rahman .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Secy.Deptt.Of Secondary Edu. Lko. And Ors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench