HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14985 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri Vijay Kumar, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 1, Sri Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava, learned counsel for the opposite parties no. 2 & 3 and perused the record. Instant writ petition has been filed with the following main reliefs :- "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite party no.3 to pay A.C.P. dues as given to similarly situated persons in the light of circular dated 20.06.2025 issued by opposite party no. 2 i.e. Managing Director Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation from the due dates with interest on delayed payment. ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the opposite party no. 3 to decide the representation dated 14.07.2025 made to opposite party no.3 to grant the benefit of A.C.P dues as given to similarly situated persons in the light of circular dated 20.06.2025 issued by opposite party no. 2 i.e. Managing Director Uttar Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (Contained as Annexure No.1) preferred by the petitioner and if any dues is found admissible then the same shall be paid to the petitioner in the time bound manner." After arguing at some length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the interest of justice would be sub-served if this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to give liberty to the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the opposite party no. 3/Regional Manager, Uttar Pradesh Road Transport Corporation, Ayodhya Region,Ayodhya and the opposite party Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shyam Narayan Shukla, Diwakar Pratap Pandey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Akhilesh Kumar Srivastava Subhash Chandra Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Transport Deptt. Lko. And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) no. 3 may be directed to consider and decide the same within the stipulated period of time, as may be fixed by this court. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite parties have no objection to the contentions aforesaid. Be that as it may, without entering into the merits of the case,the petitioners are given liberty to move a fresh representation, while raising all his claims and grounds before the opposite party no. 3/Regional Manager, Uttar Pradesh Road Transport Corporation, Ayodhya Region,Ayodhya within the period of 15 days form today and if such representation is moved within aforesaid period, the opposite party no. 3 is directed to consider and decide the same within further period of eight weeks, in accordance with law. With the aforesaid observations, the writ petition is hereby disposed of. Needless to say that if the authorities reach to the conclusion for any entitlement of the petitioner, that shall be paid accordingly. December 19, 2025 AKS WRIA No. 14985 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ANUJ KRISHNA SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench