SANGRAM RAWAT v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO
BAIL/9036/2025 · 2025-10-27
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196650 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196650 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9036 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Counter affidavit filed today is taken on record.
2. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.
3. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.16 of 2025, under Sections 310(3), P.S. B.K.T. District Lucknow.
4. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that the applicant was linked with the offence in question on the basis of a confessional statement. It is argues that on the same allegation one co accused Kunal Gupta was enlarged on bail vide order dated 13.10.2025 passed in Criminal Misc Bail Application No. 9814 of 2025. The criminal history of the applicant are similar to the criminal history of the co accused who is enlarged on bail.
5. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.
6. Considering the facts and circumstances, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 2.5.2025 is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
7. Let the applicant Sangram Rawat be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Suhail Kashif, Manish Kumar Verma Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Sangram Rawat .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko .....Opposite Party(s)
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 27, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 9036 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench