Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196649 (ALL)

AJIT KUMAR MISHRA v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. GOVT. OF U.P. DEPTT. OF TECH. EDU. LKO AND ANOTHER

WRIA/14895/2025 · 2025-12-19

Shree Prakash Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 14895 of 2025 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, Shri Lalit Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent no.2 and Shri Rajeev Singh Chauhan, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State. 2. The present petition has been filed with the following prayer: "Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus, commanding and directing the Opposite parties to re-determine the 1* promotional pay scale since year 2007 consist of Grade Pay- Rs.2400 after completing 10 years of service, 2nd promotional pay scale since year 2013 consist of Grade Pay- Rs.2800 after completing 16 years of service and 3rd promotional pay scale pay scale since 2023 consist of Grade Pay- Rs.4200 after completing 26 years of service as well as to pay the arrears of promotional pay scale along with interest there upon to the petitioner, in accordance with law. (ii) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus commanding and directing the Opposite parties to promote the petitioner in suitable post and provide the promotional benefits, in accordance with law." 3. After arguing at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the ends of justice would sub-serve if, this Court allows the petitioner to move a fresh representation before the respondent no.2 and he may be directed direct to consider and decide the same, within the time fixed by this Court. 4. Learned counsel for the respondents has no objection to the aforesaid prayer. Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Suresh Chandra Srivastava, Dr. Ajai Pratap Singh Chauhan Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Lalit Shukla Ajit Kumar Mishra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Govt. Of U.P. Deptt. Of Tech. Edu. Lko And Another .....Respondent(s) 5. Be that as it may, without entering into merits of the issue, I hereby dispose off this petition finally at the admission stage giving liberty to the petitioner to prefer a fresh representation before the respondent no.2 Director, Institute of Engineering & Technology, Lucknow ventilating his grievance taking all pleas and grounds which are available with him enclosing therewith the copy of his earlier representation, if any, which are necessary for disposal of the representation within a period of 15 days from today and if such representation is preferred by the petitioner within the aforesaid stipulated time, the authority concerned shall consider and dispose of the same strictly, by speaking and reasoned order in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner, if it is so required, with expedition preferably, within a further period of six weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order and the decision thereof shall be intimated to the petitioner, forthwith. December 19, 2025 V. Sinha WRIA No. 14895 of 2025 2 (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench