Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19664 (RAJ)

YOGESH S/O VIJENDRA v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6661/2025 · 2025-06-11

Anand Sharma V J

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:23064] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6660/2025 Dilip S/o Raghuveer, Aged About 23 Years, R/o Chainpur, Police Station Masalpur, District Karauli (Rajasthan) (At Present In Central Jail, Jaipur). ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6661/2025 Yogesh S/o Vijendra, Aged About 19 Years, R/o Pavatiyan Ka Pura, Police Station Nai Mandi, Hindaun, District Karauli, Rajasthan. (At Present Confined In District Jail Karauli) ----Petitioner Versus State of Rajasthan, through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Shekhawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Manvendra Singh Shekhawat, Dy. GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANAND SHARMA (V. J.) Order 11/06/2025 1. These bail applications have been filed by the accused- petitioners under Section 483 of BNSS in respect of FIR No. 251/2025 registered at Police Station Kho Nagoriyan, District Jaipur City (East) for the offences punishable under Sections 310(4), 310(5) & 310(6) of BNS and under Sections 4/25 & 3/25 of Arms Act. [2025:RJ-JP:23064] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6660/2025] 2. Learned counsel for the accused-petitioners submits that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated by the Police Authorities only on the basis of fake suspicion without there being any substantive cause of arrest. Learned counsel further submits that the allegations levelled in FIR are frivolous and incorrect and they were not in the process of preparing for any offence whatsoever. Counsel also submits that there is no criminal antecedents against the accused-petitioners and the accused- petitioners are behind the bars since long time. Trial is likely to take considerably long time. Therefore, the accused-petitioners may be allowed to enlarge on bail. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed these bail applications. 4. Considered the submissions made at Bar. 5. Taking into consideration, the alleged offences are triable by the Magistrate and the accused-petitioners are behind the bars since long time and they would no longer be required for custodial interrogation, this Court without expressing any opinion on the merits and demerits of the case, deems just and proper to enlarge the accused-petitioners on bail. 6. Accordingly, these Bail Applications are hereby allowed. The accused-petitioners Dilip S/o Raghuveer & Yogesh S/o Vijendra shall be released on bail in pursuance of FIR No. 251/2025 registered at Police Station Kho Nagoriyan, District Jaipur City (East) on furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 1,00,000/- each along with two sureties of the like amount. That apart, the [2025:RJ-JP:23064] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6660/2025] accused-petitioners shall also follow the conditions as under:- (i) They shall not tamper with any evidence, nor would influence the witnesses in the case. (ii) They shall not leave the country without prior permission of the Court. (iii) They shall co-operate in the trial and shall attend each and every date of hearing in the trial, until and unless their presence is exempted by the trial Court. 7. In case of failure of observance of the conditions, a ground for cancellation of bail would arise. 8. Office is directed to place a copy of this order in connected case file. (ANAND SHARMA (V. J.)),J DIVYA /219-220