PAWAN KUMAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU PRIN.SECY.PANCHAYAT RAJ CIVIL SECTT.andORS.
WRIA/3409/2017 · 2025-11-14
Shree Prakash Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196636 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196636 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - A No. - 3409 of 2017 Court No. - 18 HON'BLE SHREE PRAKASH SINGH, J.
1. Case called out.
2. None is present for the petitioner to press this writ petition.
3. Learned counsel for the State is present.
4. The writ petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
6. Consigned to records. November 14, 2025 Mayank Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Mahendra Pratap Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Gaurav Mehrotra (Shree Prakash Singh,J.) Pawan Kumar .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru Prin.Secy.Panchayat Raj Civil Sectt.Andors. .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- MAYANK PRATAP SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench