Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19663 (KAR)

GIRISH K P v. STATE OF KARNATAKA,

WP/8402/2025 · 2025-04-15

S Sunil Dutt Yadav

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC:15527 WP No. 8402 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV WRIT PETITION NO. 8402 OF 2025 (LB-BMP) BETWEEN: GIRISH K P AN INDIAN, AGED ABOUT 57 YEARS, S/O SRI. D. PAPANNA, NO.40F, 3RD CROSS LINGADAHEERANA HALLI, D GROUP LAYOUT, ANDRA HALLI MAIN ROAD, MAGADI MAIN ROAD, BENGALURU 560 091 …PETITIONER (BY SRI. ABHISHEK R., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY THE COMMISSIONER, BBMP, HUDSON CIRCLE, BENGALURU 560 001 COMM@BBMP.GOV.IN 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL, KARNATAKA STATE FIRE AND EMERGENCY SERVICES DEPARTMENT NO.1, ANNASWAMY MUDALIAR ROAD, BENGALURU 560042 DQP.KSFES@KA.GOV.IN 3. SAGAR. N INDIAN, HINDU, MAJOR FATHER'S NAME NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, NO. 400, 9TH MAIN, 41ST CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560 041 …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. PAWAN KUMAR, ADVOCATE FOR R1 SMT. B. P. RADHA, AGA FOR R2) Digitally signed by VIJAYA P Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC:15527 WP No. 8402 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECTING THE R1 AND R2 TO FORTHWITH CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATIONS DATED 19.02.2025 VIDE ANNEXURE-A1 TO A4 OF THE PETITIONER AND TAKE ACTION AGAINST THE R3 IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW AND STOP AND OR REMOVE THE ILLEGAL CONSTRUCTION BEING CRRIED OUT IN VIOLATION OF THE BBMP ACT AND RULES AT THE PROPERTY WITH PID NO.58-125-15 AT NO.400, 9TH MAIN 41ST CROSS, 5TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU- 560041 (OLD NO. 15, 41 A CROSS ROAD, 5TH BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BENGALURU - 560041). THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR JUSTICE S SUNIL DUTT YADAV ORAL ORDER After hearing the matter for sometime as regards the question of locus standi, petitioner is unable to convince the Court regarding the locus of the petitioner to make out a case as regards the building situated at Jayanagar when the petitioner stays at Magadi Road and works admittedly at Basaveshwaranagar as stated by the petitioner. At such point of time, learned counsel for petitioner files a memo and seeks for withdrawal of the petition reserving liberty to take out necessary action as is permissible in law in public interest. - 3 - NC: 2025:KHC:15527 WP No. 8402 of 2025 In light of the same, petition is dismissed. All contentions are kept open. Sd/- (S SUNIL DUTT YADAV) JUDGE VP