MOTEPALLI VENKATESWARA RAO v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/13803/2025 · 2025-05-28
Harinath N
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19662 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 19662 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH :: AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE &m CO PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13803 OF 202^ Between: Motepalli Venkateswara Rao, S/o.Narayana, Male, aged 74 R/o.Tadikalapudi Village, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru Dist., A.P.
years. ...PETITIONER AND
1. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Revenue Department, Secretarial Buildings, Velagapudi, Guntur District - 522 503. 2. The District Collector and District Magistrate, 0/o.Collectrate Office, Eluru, Eluru Dist., A.P.
3. The Revenue Divisional Officer, Jangareddigudem, Jangareddigudem Mandal, Eluru Dist., A.P.,
4. The Tahsildar, 0/o.Tahsildar, Kamavarapukota Mandal, Eluru Dist., A.P.
% / r
5. Motepalli Nagamani, 2nd wife 6f (Late) Ramarao, Hindu, Female, aged 58 years, R/o.Tadikalapudi Village, Kamavarapukota . Mandal, Eluru Dist., A.P. i.; Motepalli Gangadhara Rao, s/o.(Late) Ramarao, Hindu, Male, aged 29 years, R/o.Tadikalapudi Village, Kamavarapukota 'Mandal, Eluru Dist., A.P.
7. Motepalli Baby Sarojini, \/V/o.(Late) Ramarao, Hindu, Female, aged 63 years, R/o.Monduru Village, Pedavegi Mandal, Eluru Dist.,
8. Kethineedi Madhavi, W/o.Satyaprasad, Hindu, Female, aged 42 years, R/o.Pulla Village, Bhimadole Mandal, Eluru Dist.,
9. Sammeta Radhika, W/o.Amarendhar, Hindu, Female, aged 40 years, R/o.Kothapalli Village, Vegavaram Sivaru, Denduluru Mandal, Eluru Dist.. .'v ...RESPONDENTS Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue Writ Order or direction particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the cognizance of Appeal against the proceedings in Roc.No.50/2025, dated 16-01-2025 by the 4th respondent is without jurisdiction and not according to law and the proceedings in Roc.No. 907/2025/A, dated 14-05-2025 issued by the 3rd respondent to the be set aside. praying more petitioner is liable to lA NO: 1 OF 2()9‘^ Petition under Section 151 circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the CPC praying that in the
High Court may be pleased to pass interim directions to stay all further proceedings in Roc.No. 907/2025/A, dated 14-05-2025 issued by the 3rd respondent to the petitioner, pending disposal of the main Writ Petition. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI.
G.V.ANAND KUMAR Counsel for the Respondents No.1 to 4: GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents No.5 to 9: None appeared The Court made the following Order:
1 HN, J Wp.No.13803 _2025 APHC010276062025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) m [3457] a THURSDAY ,THE TWENTY NINETH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE HARINATH.N WRIT PETITION NO: 13803/2025 Between; Motepalli Venkateswara Rao ...PETITIONER AND ...RESPONDENT(S) The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitioner:
1.G.V.ANAND KUMAR Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.GP FOR REVENUE
2 HN, J Wp.No.13803 _2025 I I- The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the petitioner is
1. challenging the order dated 16.01.2025, whereby the property in the possession of the petitioner is sought to be reclaimed. Jangareddigudem, has been filed by the 5*^ respondent. An appeal before the RDO It is further submitted that the petitioner filed W.P.No.1592 of 2025, and
2. the learned Single Judge of this Court had suspended the impugned proceedings. However, the appeal before the RDO, Jangareddigudem , filed by the respondent No.5, is still pending. The dispute relating to the possession of the petitioner over the property 3 has to be resolved by the competent authority. This Court finds no grounds to interfere. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To,
1. One CC to Sri. G.V.Anand Kumar, Advocate [OPUC]
2. Two CCs to GP for REVENUE .High Court Of Andhra Pradesh. [OUT]
3. Three CD Copies vna
HIGH COURT DATE0:29/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.13803 of 2025 ^ 15 JUN 2025 CO Pi DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS