POONAM DEVI v. STATE OF U.P THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND 4 OTHERS
A482/1622/2022 · 2025-10-07
Brij Raj Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196606 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196606 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 1622 of 2022 Court No. - 16 HON'BLE BRIJ RAJ SINGH, J.
1. Case called out in the revised list.
2. No one has put in appearance on behalf of the applicant. Whereas, Shri Rajdeep Singh, learned AGA-I on behalf of the State-opposite party and Shri Amrendra Pratap Singh, learned counsel for the complainant are present.
3. In view of the above, the present application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
October 7, 2025 V. Sinha Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Amitesh Pratap Singh, Laxmi Narayan Gupta, Naveen Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Armendra Pratap Singh, Kaushlendra Yadav (Brij Raj Singh,J.) Poonam Devi .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- VAISHALI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench