Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196599 (ALL)

AYSA KHATOON AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO. AND OTHERS

CRLP/5711/2024 · 2025-11-10

Pramod Kumar Srivastava, Rajiv Gupta

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 5711 of 2024 Court No. - 30 HON'BLE RAJIV GUPTA, J. HON'BLE PRAMOD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned AGA for the State and perused the record. 2. At the very outset, learned AGA for the State has pointed out that in the instant case, investigation has already been concluded and the final report has also been submitted in favour of the petitioners. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners could not dispute the aforesaid facts. 4. In view of the statement made, this writ petition is dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. November 10, 2025 Nadim Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Shiv Pal Singh, Anurag Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A., Sandeep Kumar(Trivedi) (Pramod Kumar Srivastava,J.) (Rajiv Gupta,J.) Aysa Khatoon And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko. And Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- NADIM ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench