SUBEDAR v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME AND 4 OTHERS
BAILC/103/2022 · 2025-11-15
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196598 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196598 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 103 of 2022 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A.
2. The present bail cancellation has been filed seeking cancellation of bail granted to the accused on 11.02.2021.
3. The Submission of the Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant has not followed the conditions.
4. Considering the fact that substantial time has elapsed and there being no material to suggest any good ground to cancel the bail at this stage, the bail cancellation application is rejected. November 15, 2025 akverma Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Vijayendra Prakash Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Subedar .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home And 4 Others .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- ASHOK KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench