Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 196589 (ALL)

SHAH MOHAMMAD v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. MINISTRY OF HOME LKO AND 5 OTHERS

CRLP/6884/2025 · 2025-10-06

Subhash Vidyarthi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 6884 of 2025 Court No. - 13 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J. Shri Rajan Singh, the learned counsel for the petition states that the petitioner does not want to press the instant writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and he seeks liberty to file a fresh petition under appropriate statutory provisions. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with the aforesaid liberty. Let the certified copies annexed with the petition be returned to the learned counsel for the applicant after retaining their photocopies on record. October 6, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rajan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Shah Mohammad .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Ministry Of Home Lko And 5 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench