Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 19656 (MAD)

Arumugam v. Pradeepkumar

CMP/3302/2025 · 2025-03-17

S Sounthar

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CMP No.3302 of 2025 in CMA SR No.13923 of 2025 S.SOUNTHAR, J. Notice to the first respondent already dispensed with. Heard the learned counsel for the petitioner and the second respondent. Being satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed along with the petition and the additional affidavit, the delay of 546 days in filing the appeal is condoned. Petitioner is not entitled to claim interest for the delay period. Registry is directed to number the civil miscellaneous appeal, if it is otherwise in order and list the same for admission. Registry is directed to print the name of Mr.B.Sivakolappan, counsel for the second respondent at the time of admission. 17.03.2025 mst https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis