SMT. MONA NIGAM v. BRANCH MANAGER BANK OF INDIA TEHRI PULIYA BRANCH LKO. AND ANOTHER
WRIC/9918/2025 · 2025-10-15
Subhash Vidyarthi
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196552 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196552 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW WRIT - C No. - 9918 of 2025 Court No. - 17 HON'BLE SUBHASH VIDYARTHI, J.
1. Heard Smt. Sandhya Singh, the learned counsel for the petitioner, Smt. Seema Dixit, the learned Standing Counsel for the State of U.P. and Shri Vinay Shankar, the learned counsel for the opposite party No.1-Bank of India.
2. By means of the instant petition, the petitioner has challenged the recovery notice dated 21.06.2025 but the learned counsel for the petitioner has advanced submission for a prayer for granting facility of repaying the dues in easy installments.
3. Learned counsel for the opposite parties have stated that there is no illegality in the recovery proceedings. However, the learned counsel for the respondent No.1 bank has stated that the bank is interested in recovery of its loan and in case the petitioner herself deposits the same, the bank will have no objection.
4. Accordingly, the petition is disposed off by providing that the petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.90,000/- within a period of 15 days and the balance amount shall be deposited in seven equal quarterly installments. The bank shall communicate the exact amount of installments payable by the petitioner immediately after the receipt of the first installment.
5. The operation and implementation of the recovery citation dated 21.06.2025 issued by Tehsildar, Sadar, Lucknow against the petitioner (Annexure No.1 to the writ petition) shall remain in abeyance subject to the petitioner continuing to deposit the due amount in terms of this order. The benefit of this order shall not be available to the petitioner in case she commits default in payment of installment as per this order.
October 15, 2025 -Amit K- Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Sandhya Singh, Aman Singh Bhadoriya, Jitendra Vikram Counsel for Respondent(s) : Vinay Shankar, C.S.C. (Subhash Vidyarthi,J.) Smt. Mona Nigam .....Petitioner(s) Branch Manager Bank Of India Tehri Puliya Branch Lko. And Another .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- AMIT KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench