SHAMIM AHMAD v. DISTT. MAGISTRATE/COLLECTOR, BAHRAICH DISTT. BAHRAICH AND 4 OTHERS
WPIL/1080/2025 · 2025-10-15
Rajan Roy, Rajeev Bharti
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196541 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196541 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW PUBLIC INTEREST LITIGATION (PIL) No. - 1080 of 2025 Court No. - 1 HON'BLE RAJAN ROY, J.
HON'BLE RAJEEV BHARTI, J.
1. Heard.
2. The land bearing Gata No. 209 admittedly is a land submerged in water and is recorded as such in the Khatauni, copy of which is annexed. The other land reference to which has been made by the counsel for the petitioner bearing Gata No. 195 as informed is also similar land. If the Revenue authorities are proceeding to settle the said land for exercise of fishery rights as per law, then how a PIL would be maintainable in such a matter is inexplicable.
3. The petition being misconceived is, accordingly, dismissed. October 15, 2025 Shravan Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Yatendra Pal Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Pankaj Gupta (Rajeev Bharti,J.) (Rajan Roy,J.) Shamim Ahmad .....Petitioner(s) Distt. Magistrate/Collector, Bahraich Distt. Bahraich And 4 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SHRAVAN KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench