HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 8617 of 2025 Court No. - 14 HON'BLE RAJEEV SINGH, J. 1. Vakalatnama filed by Shri Firoz Ahmad Khan, Advocate on behalf of the private respondents is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants, learned A.G.A. for the State of U.P., learned counsel for the private respondents and perused the record. 3. This application has been filed with the following prayer:- "To quash the impugned charge-sheet dated 12.03.2023 arising out of Case Crime No. 03 of 2023 u/s 147, 148, 427, 308, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali Nagar, District- Gonda and the summoning order dated 05.06.2023 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gonda in Case No. 12380 of 2023 including entire proceedings in pursuance thereof." 4. Learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned counsel for the private respondents jointly submitted that vide order dated 24.09.2025, a direction was given to the trial court to verify the factum of compromise executed by the parties. In pursuance of the aforesaid order, learned trial court had verified the contents of compromise. 5. Learned counsel for the applicants and learned counsel for the private respondents jointly submitted that the parties have entered into compromise, which has duly been verified by the trial court vide report/order dated 30.09.2025. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Mohd. Imran Khan Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Mahboob Ali Khan And 5 Others .....Applicant(s) The The State Of U.P. Thru. Its Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. And 3 Others .....Opposite Party(s) 6. Learned A.G.A. has fairly conceded that compromise has been effected between the parties and the same has duly been verified by the trial court. 7. Hon'ble Apex Court in catena of decisions has held that inherent power can be used to do real and substantial justice as has been held in Gian Singh Vs State of Punjab, 2012 AIR SCW 5333, B.S. Joshi and others Vs State of Haryana, (2003) 3 SCC 675 and Narinder Singh Vs State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466. Hence, inherent power can be exercised to speed up the process of ending the criminal proceedings where the settlement is arrived at between the parties. 8. In view of the aforesaid and the fact that parties do not want to pursue the case any further, the matter is purely of personal nature, which has been mutually settled between the parties by way of the compromise, therefore, no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 9. For the discussions made above, the present application is allowed. The impugned charge-sheet dated 12.03.2023 arising out of Case Crime No. 03 of 2023 u/s 147, 148, 427, 308, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Kotwali Nagar, District- Gonda and the summoning order dated 05.06.2023 passed by learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Gonda in Case No. 12380 of 2023 including entire proceedings in pursuance thereof are hereby quashed. 10. Office is directed to communicate this order to learned trial Court, forthwith. October 9, 2025 Arpan A482 No. 8617 of 2025 2 (Rajeev Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench Digitally signed by :- ARPAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench