SONAM AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. HOME LKO AND 3 OTHERS
CRLP/11961/2025 · 2025-12-19
Babita Rani, Rajnish Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196528 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196528 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 11961 of 2025 Court No. - 10 HON'BLE RAJNISH KUMAR, J.
HON'BLE MRS. BABITA RANI, J.
1. Heard Sri Meva Lal Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioners and learned A.G.A. for the State.
2. On an objection raised by learned A.G.A. that the petitioners are already married, therefore, they are not entitled for any protection, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that this petition may be dismissed as not pressed with liberty to avail other appropriate remedy as may be available under law. To which, there is no objection by learned A.G.A.
3. In view of above, this writ petition is dismissed as not pressed with aforesaid liberty. December 19, 2025 Saurabh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Harshita Gupta, Meva Lal Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : G.A. (Mrs. Babita Rani,J.) (Rajnish Kumar,J.) Sonam And Another .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Home Lko And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SAURABH VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench