ADARSH SINGH @ MANU SINGH v. STATE OF U.P. THRU. PRIN. SECY. DEPTT. HOME LKO.
BAIL/9977/2025 · 2025-10-15
Pankaj Bhatia
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196524 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 196524 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD LUCKNOW CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9977 of 2025 Court No. - 12 HON'BLE PANKAJ BHATIA, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State, Shri Deepak Kumar Pandey, who has filed vakalatnama on behalf of informant and perused the record.
2. The applicant seeks enlargement on bail in FIR No.155 of 2025, under Section 69 BNS, P.S. Sangrampur, District Amethi.
3. Learned counsel for the applicant argues that in terms of FIR it was alleged that the applicant and the victim were having physical relations for last two years and subsequently she became pregnant. Learned counsel for the applicant states that the applicant is ready to marry the victim. In the statement under Section 180 and 183 BNSS consent is noticed. The victim is pregnant and is aged about 26 years.
4. Learned AGA and learned counsel for the informant have opposed the bail application.
5. Considering the age of victim and the applicant's consent the case for bail is made out, however, without commenting upon the merits of the case, the applicant who is in jail since 12.8.2025 and has no criminal history is entitled to be enlarged on bail. In view thereof, the application is allowed.
6. Let the applicant Adarsh Singh @ Monu Singh be released on bail in aforesaid FIR number on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Kalika Prasad Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Adarsh Singh @ Manu Singh .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P. Thru. Prin. Secy. Deptt. Home Lko. .....Opposite Party(s)
of Rs.20,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions: (a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings; (b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and (c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence. October 15, 2025 J. K. Dinkar BAIL No. 9977 of 2025 2 (Pankaj Bhatia,J.) Digitally signed by :- JESHU KUMAR DINKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench