Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Page No.# 1/3 GAHC010214722024
2025:GAU-AS:13897
THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : I.A.(Civil)/4080/2024 SMTI PREMI DEMTA W/O LATE ABINASH CHRISTIAN D/O LATE SILAS CHRISTIAN PIN 786156 2: ELIAZAR BHENGRA R/O UDALGURI GAON P.O. RANGCHANGI P.S. TENGAKHAT DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN 786156 VERSUS LEGAL HEIRS OF RAMJI SHAH LABA KUMAR SHAH and ORS 1.1:SRI LABA KUMAR SHAH S/O LATE RAMJI KUMAR SHAH R/O UDLAGURI GAON P.O RANGCHANGI PS. TENGAKHAT DISTRICT DIBRUGARH PIN 786103 ASSSAM 1.2:SRI ASHOK KUMAR SHAH S/O LATE RAMJI KUMAR SHAH R/O UDLAGURI GAON P.O RANGCHANGI PS. TENGAKHAT DISTRICT DIBRUGARH PIN 786103
Page No.# 2/3 ASSSAM 2:THE STATE OF ASSAM REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN 786156 3:THE CIRCLE OFFICER CHABUA REVENUE CIRCLE CHABUA DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN 786156 4:GENERAL MANAGER OIL INDIA LTD. DULIAJAN DIST. DIBRUGARH ASSAM PIN 786156 ------------ Advocate for : MR. B K BHATTACHARJEE Advocate for : appearing for LEGAL HEIRS OF RAMJI SHAH
BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE MRIDUL KUMAR KALITA ORDER 16.10.2025
1. Heard Mr. B.K. Bhuyan, the learned counsel for the applicants. Also heard Md. A. Rahman, the learned counsel for the respondent No. 1 as well as Mr. N. Sarania, the learned counsel on behalf of Mr. A. Sarma for the respondent No. 4 as well as Mr. T.R. Gogoi, the learned counsel for the respondent Nos. 2 and 3. 2. This application under Order 22 Rule 4 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 has been filed by the applicants praying for substitution of the legal heirs of the respondent No. 1, namely, Ramji Shah, who expired on 05.02.2022. Page No.# 3/3 Though the appeal was abated on his death, however, the abatement has been set aside by this Court, by order dated 16.10.2025, passed in I.A.(Civil) No. 4083/2024. 3. The applicant has prayed for substituting the names of Laba Kumar Shah and Ashok Kumar Shah, who are the sons of deceased respondent late Ramji Shah. 4. The said prayer is not opposed to by the respondent’s side. 5. Hence, the same is allowed. 6. The names of Laba Kumar Shah and Ashok Kumar Shah shall be substituted as respondent No. 1(a) and 1(b) in place of deceased respondent Ramji Kumar Shah. 7. The applicant shall submit an amended memo of appeal showing the names of the substituted defendant therein. 8.
Registry is directed to list the connected appeal after 2(two) weeks. JUDGE Comparing Assistant