2025:JHHC:22565 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 6904 of 2025 --------- Kuma Devi, wife of Nityanand Yadav, aged about 47 years, resident of village Tadi, P.S. Jarmundi, P.O. Chamra Bahiyar, District Dumka. ....Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand ....Opp. Party --------- CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE DEEPAK ROSHAN --------- For the Petitioner : Mr. Prabhat Kr. Sinha, Advocate For the Opp. Party : Mr. Pankaj Kumar, P.P. --------- 02/08.08.2025 Heard learned counsels for the parties. 2. The instant bail application has been preferred by the petitioner for grant of regular bail for the offences registered under Sections 406, 420, 467, 468, 471 of Indian Penal Code, in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No.71 of 2019. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner is innocent and has committed no offence as alleged in the FIR and she has been falsely implicated in the present case. He further submits that petitioner being TET pass was appointed as an Assistant Teacher and accordingly, she served the department for more than 3 years having no complaint whatsoever. Thereafter, the DSE Giridih issued a show-cause that her certificate is suspicious. Learned counsel further submits that though petitioner has very good academic credentials, but merely on assumption and presumption that her certificate is not genuine, she has been made an accused in the present case. He further submits that petitioner is languishing in custody since 14.05.2025; as such, the petitioner may be enlarged on bail. She is ready to abide by every condition imposed by this court. 4. Mr. Pankaj Kumar, learned Public Prosecutor opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. 5. Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, I am inclined to enlarge this petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 20,000/- (Rupees Twenty Thousand only) with two sureties of the like amount each to 2025:JHHC:22565 2 the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Giridih in connection with Bengabad P.S. Case No.71 of 2019. 6. It is made clear that the petitioner shall appear on each and every date before the learned trial court and if any adverse report will come against this petitioner, learned trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail of this petitioner. (Deepak Roshan, J.) kunal/-